“Computer Forensic Expert” gets defined

Historically, the definition of what constitutes a “computer forensics expert” has been a loose one. Now, however, a number of states have taken action to tighten the rules and regulations that must be met in order for such an investigator to testify in court. South Carolina is one state considering such changes; a bill is up for consideration there that would only allow computer forensic experts to testify in court if those experts are employed by (or own, presumably) businesses that primarily engage in legal work or divorce cases. In essence, the bill would require digital forensic analysts to obtain a PI (private investigator) license if they wish to testify in court.

The purpose of such legislation is not to hinder the commercial success of computer forensics experts or to restrict the number of people practicing the trade. Calling oneself a computer forensics expert in the Yellow Pages and testifying as such in a court of law are two very different things; the distinction hangs upon the legal definition of an expert witness. (link)

forensic data recovery


0 Responses to ““Computer Forensic Expert” gets defined”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 29 other followers

Technorati – Blog Search

Add to Technorati Favorites

submit express


%d bloggers like this: